I would like to hear some theories if you would.
And if someone could give me the dates/ explain the Atlantians and the pyramids that would be amazing thanks!
Atlantis is believed to have existed in the vicinity of the Tigres and Euphrates rivers. Plato mentions the Pillars of Hercules and what is really interesting is that many different cultures(in that area) refer to the same geographical location...even the Bible with the Garden of Eden.
Yes, Atlantis really did exist and was destroyed in a cataclysmic event, such as a volcanic eruption or earthquake, or both. Then there was a tsunami which finished the job.
the Atlanteans migrated to many different regions and even eventually got as far as the western hemisphere. It was a highly evolved culture which was destroyed due to natural forces, like many other ancient civilizations.
:-)
Oh by the way, the ancient city at the bottom of a lake near Mexico City is the ancient city of Tenochtitlan, and not necessarily Atlantis. However, many Atlantean societies evolved after the initial migration. Some were destroyed and others just...evolved!
Look up the Timaeus and the Critias-the Plato dialogues where Atlantis is discussed. Also, check out this website and google some others:
http://www.pantheon.org/articles/a/atlantis.html
According to the book Atlantis: New Light on an Old Legend by J.V. Luce, Atlantis was the Minoan civilization which was destroyed by the eruption of the volcanic caldera on the island of Thera (now Santorni, well...what's left of it!). The Minoans lived on Crete, in the city of Knossus, near Akrotiri, and their civilization was wiped out in "a single day and night of horrible destruction" that is, they really did "sink in the depths of the sea"--at least for a little while. Then when all the water went back out to sea, it swept everyone in the Minoan kingdom back out to sea with it. The book is heavily appendded with lots of geographical data from all over the Medditerranean region that supports his claim (which is actually the claim of an archaeologist by the name of Marinatos-who actually discovered the kingdom of Knossus, which up until his time was thought to be a myth).
Marinatos' claim as we read it through Luce's writings, also answers alot of the questions asked concerning the actual discrepancies in the legend of Atlantis itself. Check it out! It made a believer out of this skeptic!
Hello,
Atlantis is an interesting myth but there never has been any empirical evidence. The word's population 12,000 years ago was less than 10 million, most hunter - gatherers just starting to form villages as such and there was not enough talent in that sort of gene pool to have had made the advances attributed to the Atlanteans.
Edit - OK, I'll elaborte a more on this:
Well according to legend and what Plato said, Atlantis lay beyond
the "Pillars Of Hercules " which is the Rock of Gibraltar.
In my opinion, I think it is just a legend with no archeological
proof found to date. A colonizing power,
technically superior like Rome has buildings and artifacts as well as
historical records from Saudi Arabia to Scotland so I believe it.
Where is such evidence for Atlantis 12,000 years ago? One building,
one dagger or statue? The bottom of the Atlantic in the middle of the
ocean is a basaltic volcanic range, spreading a few inches a year
with no continental materials; I'm afraid plate tectonics sunk
Ignatius Donelly's theory.
I would agree that the ancients had considerable skills; I'm sure an
ancient would learn to drive a car far quicker for example than one
of us could manage a team of horses and chariot.
Again I am thinking of the number of geniuses and inventors in small
populations. I'll show you the whole section From " The Ancient
Engineers " by L. Sprague De Camp who wrote and might clarify things
a little better:
" Nevertheless during all of the last million years invention
progressed with glacial slowness... by 100,000 years ago, however
man had probably become quite as intelligent as we are-but still
technology advanced at a crawl.
The reason for the sloth of invention in primative societies is easy
to understand. For one thing people live a hand to mouth existence.
Most of their foods cannot be stored so they have no economic
surplus. Therefore they can less afford to risk experiment than more
advanced people. If an experiment fails they die.
As a result primative societies are very conservative. Tribal
customs prescribe exactly how everything shall be done, on pain of
the gods' displeasure. An inventor is likely to be liquidated as a
dangerous deviationist.
Another cause of the slowness of primative invention is the scarcity
of inventors. A hunting and food gathering technology can support
only a very small population for a given area. Thus the few hundred
thousand to 2 million members of the human species living at any
time before the Agicultural Revolution were divided into many
isolated little hunting bands.
Such a band seldom exceeds 50 or a hundred people, counting the many
but short lived children. Because the radius of action of the
hunters is limited to the distance they can walk to kill game and
carry it back to their camp, an increase in numbers does not enlarge
the area that can be hunted at one time. It merely causes the same
area to be hunted more intensively. So, if the band grows too large,
game in the neighbourhood becomes scarce; and the band might migrate
or starve...
Now, in any society, only a few human beings ever have original
ideas or make inventions. Of these inventors, only a fraction have
the courage, stubbornness, and energy to keep on bettering their
inventions until they really work and keep promoting them until they
pursuade others to take them up.
A rough idea of the percentage of inventors among modern Americans
of the mid 20th century can be obtained from the statistics of the
American patent office. The Pattent office issues about 40,000
patents every year. So we can estimate that the mid 20th century
American population of 180 million people produces about one
patentable invention each year foe every 4500 citizens.
Suppose now that all Americans (at this time) were wiped out except
for one band of 45 people.. If this group continued to produce
inventions at the same rate, it would turn out only one invention
every century! This of course is a gross oversimplification but it
does indicate why a small tribal society, no matter how clever the
tribesmen, cannot be expected to produce inventions rapidly...
Suppose now there are 2 bands of 45 Americans. If they are isolated
from each other, each band will produce one invention per century,
so that each progresses at the same rate as before. Their cultures
will diverge somewhat, as they will hit upon the same inventions
only rarely, by chance.
However, if they meet and join forces, then all 90 persons will take
advantage of the inventions produced by any one of them... in other
words they will progress technologically twice as fast.
To sum up: Progress in civilization depends upon invention, and a
rapid rate of invention in turn depends upon the sizeable
populations that are only possible under civilization. The crucial
inventions that made such progress possible - Knowledge of raising
domesticated, edible animals and plants - took place in Syria and
Iraq about 8000 years ago."
L. Sprague De Camp
Now taking the above narration into account I still cannot help but
wonder how the civilization of Atlantis could have ever existed a
few thousand years before hunter-gather tribes of 2 - 10 million plus or
minus in the world even started amalgemating with one another to
form the first primative farming communities.
Also the lack of archeological evidence combined with the above
makes he outlook rather dismal in my opinion.
Cheers,
Michael Kelly
There are many theories but off the florida cost there has been found what they call the Bimini Road. It is a sunken paved road so Atlantis may have been somewhere close to the isle of Bimini. Other theories say it is in the caspian sea I believe and there is even a theory floating around in Mexico that it is in the bottem of the lake in the center of Mexico City.
http://www.activemind.com/Mysterious/Topics/Atlantis/
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/pyramid/
http://www.ancientegypt.co.uk/pyramids/home.html
http://www.nationalgeographic.com/pyramids/pyramids.html
Atlantis is only one fabled sunken city.
http://www.abc.se/~m10354/uwa/sunkcity.htm
It flooded. That is all. There was a city. It flooded.
Probably some island civilization which sank. Some islands do sink.